Sunday, February 25, 2007

Disgusting Child Porn Case That You Probably Won't Hear Much About ........

Maybe it's due to the perpetrator involved. I first saw this over at Ace of Spades Friday(?).

Former ACLU Chapter President Arrested for Child Pornography. (ABC News link)

"Feb. 23, 2007— Federal agents arrested Charles Rust-Tierney, the former president of the Virginia chapter of the ACLU, Friday in Arlington for allegedly possessing child pornography.
According to a criminal complaint obtained by ABC News, Rust-Tierney allegedly used his e-mail address and credit card to subscribe to and access a child pornography website."

Here's my favorite part - "Rust Tierney coaches various youth sports teams in and around Arlington, Virginia, according to court documents."

Ace has a couple of follow up posts with links on this disgusting BS that you should follow up and read.

First one here from Friday - ACLU Child Porn Follow-Ups

And one from this Morning - Shock: Media Almost Entirely Embargoing ACLU Child Porn Story

I know, you're asking yourself - "Why the hell should I read about, or give a shit, about that nasty, Pervert Sonzabitch?"

Because it should interest you to know the ACLU's official position on things like, you know, Raping little kids.

ACLU Policy To Legalize Child Porn Distribution (Via Stop the ACLU)

"The ACLU’s position is this: criminalize the production but legalize the sale and distribution of child pornography. This is the kind of lawyerly distinction that no one on the Supreme Court found convincing. And with good reason: as long as a free market in child pornography exists, there will always be some producers willing to risk prosecution. Beyond this, there is also the matter of how the sale of child pornography relates either to free speech or the ends of good government. But most important, the central issue is whether a free society should legalize transactions that involve the wholesale sexploitation of children for profit.”
The ACLU objects to the idea that porn movie producers be required to maintain records of ages of its performers; this would be ” a gross violation of privacy.”

What a bunch of Fuckin' Sweethearts, Eh?

"Buggerin' Your Children. It's all about the free speech, Bitch. Now shut the fuck up."

0 comments

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home